Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChuckElias
However, B3's FT didn't occur during the erroneous FTs by A2.
So the rule explicitly tells us to cancel A3's common foul. But it doesn't seem to tell us to cancel the FTs that resulted from that foul. It doesn't say cancel the foul and any related activity. It just says the foul is cancelled.
Are B3's FTs cancelled b/c they were awarded erroneously? No.
Are B3's FTs cancelled b/c they were attempted by the wrong playe? No.
|
Chuck, rule 2-10-4 says that you cancel any activity
during a FT attempt by the wrong player except for unsporting, flagrant, intentional or technical fouls. A3's common foul is therefore cancelled, by rule. If you cancel A3's foul, you also cancel any succeeding FT's for that foul. Whatinthehell would you put B3 on the line for if no foul ever occurred?
B3's FT's are cancelled because B3 was
NEVER fouled.
You're over-thinking this one.