Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Please, let me...
...a palm in the back court with no defensive pressure is not obvious. The baseball guys have a term for this type of call - it's a F you call.
However, if A1 palms the ball to beat his defender on a drive to the basket...THAT'S an obvious call.
It's very simple, once you own the magic decoder ring.
|
Where can I get one of those decoder rings? It's obvious that I really, really need one because I am still very confused.
If a player has the ball come to rest on his palm for....oh, to just pick a number....one second in the back court, then that's not a violation if he continues dribbling. But if a player in the front court also lets the ball come to rest for one second, then dribbles again, it is a violation. Correct?
So.......since they are the
exact same violation, can I also extrapolate that it's true that if you touch the ball with both hands in the back court with no defensive pressure and then dribble again, then that isn't a violation either? But, if you touch the ball with both hands in the front court and dribble again, you do have a violation. Correct?
Please bear in mind that in
both cases, the dribbler is committing the
exact same act and they are both
equally obvious to everyone in the gym, as well as people watching at home. The only difference is that one act occurs in the back court and the other, similar act occurs in the front court. But....one should be called and the other one shouldn't. Right?
Or is there something that I'm still not understanding here, being not too bright to begin with?