Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LilLeaguer
Sorry for the public message, but you seem to have PM turned off.
Given a situation where a protest is imminent, the facts are not in dispute, and it's about player eligibility, I think the umpire has three choices: - He should feel required to know the rules and communicate them before the offending play happens (LL)
- If he knows the rules, the most he would do is communicate them before the offending play happens (BU)
- He shouldn't know the rules, and he certainly shouldn't communicate them. (RF)
In my judgement, positions 1 and 2 are almost in agreement, at least when compared with 3. That is all I was saying. |
Okay, I stand corrected. It's not your reading skill that's impaired. It's your reading comprehension skills that's impaired. BU did not state #2 as you claim. At least is his post above, nowhere does he say "IF" the umpire knows the rule. All he says is that they (umpires in his association) would advise of the rule.
Unless you are running for opffice, it's always better form to not change the statement you are debating.