Tue Aug 29, 2006, 02:17pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scott1231
Her: "Well ... It's really slow."
Me: "Slow? What do you mean?"
Her: "It seemed like it took you forEVER to call a strike."
Me: "Nah, hon ... it just seems like forever."
Her: "Really. I've never seen that before. It made you look like you were hesitant, not sure of your call."
Me: "Well, kinda hesitating. I look at the pitch, retrace it quickly, quietly say "yes" to the catcher and hitter, and bang it."
Her: "It just looks stupid, you calling a strike when the ball is going back to the pitcher. Didn't anyone else complain?"
Me: "No, in fact the catchers liked it that I said 'yes' before banging it."
Her: "Well, it looks stupid, but you must have had good game. I didn't hear anyone in the stands say anything about your zone."
Okay, maybe that wasn't word-for-word, and more of a compilation of conversations we had this past season ... but you get the idea.
Did it make me aware that the perception was that our mechanic is slow? Yes.
Did I change my timing because of her perception? No.
Did I get batters running off or head-whipping? No.
I'm pretty sure it was actually my wife writing that article under a pseudonym.
The thought that, by using proper timing on ball/strike calls, we are trying to draw attention to ourselves or that we are adding to the time of the game is ridiculous.
|
Timing is proper use of the eyes...not hesitation.
__________________
GB
|