[JRutledge]

Only because if something happen to him during the remainder of the game, you might have been blamed for not taking action. I think this is a touch call, but you have the right as an official to rule on anything that is not in the rulebook. And this is not obviously in the rulebook. But if all the other parties were thought that he was OK then I guess you did the right thing with the information that you had.

I guess in these situations you have to do what you feel is right. If think he should not play, you do have the rules and the jurisdiction to handle it. But what I want to know, what the hell was his mother thinking?