View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 07:16pm
IREFU2 IREFU2 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
My only problem is that such statements are applied too broadly. I too typically pass on contact that follows a block...but only to a point. At some point, the contact becomes too substantial to not be a foul. Where that point lies is certainly a topic worthy of debate but such a line should and does exist.

To say a blocker shouldn't be held liable for any contact after a block is analagous to saying a shooter shouldn't be held liable for anycontact after the shot is released...no matter how hard. The NFHS and NCAA have different penalties for this situation but it is called if the conact is enough.
No doubt about that and trust me I will call a foul by all mean if the shooter is put at a disadvantage or if contact caused him to miss the shot.
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote