Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
For 10-1-1, there has been no technical foul for a team to comply with. Whether such action is a travesty is certain possible. The rules don't offer any suggestion of the types of acts that would be a travesty. I'm thinking of attempts to cheat or a coach refusing to leave after being DQ'd.
I believe 10-1-3 addresses a team that refuses/fails to take the court. It doesn't address the manner in which they play.
10-3-20 is not applicable either. That's to cover a player batting the ball in the stands on purpose or refusing to give the ball to an official when the ball is dead.
The only thing that is left in the officials pocket is 2-3...and it might be the best thing to use.
|
One man's assho....I mean, opinion.
Quote:
In fact, if any of these rules were applicable, North Carolina would not have nearly so many wins....several of those contests were actionless. 
|
And if Aldoph Rupp had be willing to recruit black athletes, UK would have a lot more wins.
