The foul tip has been ignored in the SP game for years because it really didn't make a difference as to the runner's status. Now that there is stealing involved, some people have seen how it works and can make a difference.
A foul tip is unintentional. More likely than not, a foul tip is caught by the catcher in the same location the ball would have been caught had the bat not contacted the ball. A batted ball, caught in flight, has always been an out by rule with the exception of a foul tip.
Explanations to someone who doesn't understand the rule:
A line drive to a pitcher or any infielder may not go over the batter's head, but if caught, is an out. Why would it be different with a ball over foul territory. It requires much more reactive skill/ability for a catcher to snag a poorly batted ball not higher than the batter's head in flight than any other fly ball.
If a blooper in front of the plate which does not go above the batter's head can advance the BR to first safely counts as a hit, why wouldn't the equally batted ball in the opposited direction be caught for an out?
When the response is, "but it was foul!", remind them that a ball cannot be foul until it touches the ground or something not in fair territory other than a defender or defender's glove.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|