Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bossman72
DG-
Check out 2006 case book 9.1.1 M
Yes, i also agree, it's a stupid rule
|
This "
change" in FED interpretation for 2006 is duly noted in the 2006 BRD. Casebook play 9.1.1 M reads differently in the 2005 casebook. BRD also notes that this is a timing play in NCAA and OBR.
I was not aware of the change, but I am now.