Thread: New Rules POLL
View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 02, 2006, 04:14pm
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie
2. I think you should know I was gearing for the fouling to stop the clock crowd. That would mean this wouldn't apply, obviously, to player control fouls. Perhaps a little thought would have to be given to team control fouls, but as of now, I don't see exempting them as a problem either.

4. Then explain how the lead can see both the rim and the feet of players on the lane opposite him. I have as good a perifial vision as anyone and get back farther than everyone, yet I still have trouble seeing both the rim and the players' feet. Further, it isn't necessary. There's no reason not to allow them in the lane. If there's a foul, call the foul. I played under this rule in HS and before (I think) and then the rule changed. Why they changed it back I don't know.

5. It isn't a rule per se, but more of a custom that I don't like. I was out of officiating for a while and came back in, and now it seems to be of widespread use in varsity and JV games. I'd prefer just to check the book at 10 and leave it at that. Some say if you give the coach the book to sign, then they can't complain when there's a problem later. I had a game eariler this year where a coach actually complained after a player reported who wasn't in the book that we didn't give him a chance to sign the book; we responded it was a courtesy and not a requirement, but he still argued it was required. At any rate, I had many more book related technicals this year than in all my years of previous basketball officiating.
2) Why would you penalize the offensive team more than the defensive team just because it's in the last minute? You also might be gearing for the "fouling to stop the clock crowd" but you're also penalizing the defense when they are ahead and don't really want to stop the clock, but they commit a foul trying to play good defense anyway.

4) Geeze, I don't know. I've never really had a problem and I've heard other official say that they haven't had any problems either. Other readers....are you having a problem making this call? Btw, if you are having trouble watching the ball hit the rim and the player's feet at the same time, then you're gonna have a heckuva lot more trouble watching the feet across the lane and the shooter's hands at the same time. As for the reason not to allow players into the paint until the ball hits? The rule was instituted to cut down the excess contact and wrestling matches that were going on during the earlier release rule.

5) Might be a custom in a few places but it ain't a rule. I've never heard of it being a widespread custom either. It ain't a good custom either imo. During the last 10 minutes before game time, a head coach has got a heckuva lot more on his mind than worrying about the book. That's why they have assistants and managers. If the FED wants to institute something like that, then they should just add the coach's signature to the list of what must be in the book at the 10 minute mark. That way, we don't chase anybody and we just have to look at the book- and if a signature isn't there----> team technical foul. I don't think that one is gonna fly though. Jmo, but you're gonna get a lot of screaming head coaches if you try to implement that one.
Reply With Quote