View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 28, 2006, 06:03pm
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
This says not nearly as much as the 2005 ruling. This is so poorly written that it "appears" to back the balk call yet I have NEVER heard of an umpire in a NFHS game call a balk on the 3rd to first move when there was no throw to first base.
And when you say you have NEVER heard of a balk being called on this move, you mean that the umpire makes no discernment as to whether F1 is in contact with the rubber when making his move toward 1st. Correct?

In other words, it's simply not a balk, one way or the other.

That's how I would prefer to call it.

But, apparently I'm learning that I don't get to make that type of judgment.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote