Quote:
Originally posted by All_Heart
No I was saying the coach should have an indirect because A1 became a bench player when his sub was beckoned in the game.
I'm assuming that a sub was beckoned on the court to replace A1 because A1 had left the court for a substitution.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by PAT THE REF
A1 is playing and walking to the bench for a substitution. I'm across the court at the free throw line extended on the sideline ready to inbound the ball and A1 walks back onto the court and says "Ref, YOU SHOULD JUST DIE, I HOPE YOU DIE" TWEET got him again. B shoots 2 & makes 1. then the debate is how the A coach says I can't T his player since he's not on the court. etc.
[/B]
|
Ok, good. Funny, I assumed there was no beckoning as it was not mentioned.
But I do agree with your statement that once A3 is beckoned, A1 is BP, and is an indirect to the HC.