View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 09, 2006, 08:28pm
Dan_ref Dan_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
The difference is that the stuff you're getting in your creaky knees, Dan, is legal and is meant specifically for the problems you have. That's completely different than taking a drug when you don't have a physical problem that needs treating, and that drug is illegal to boot.

Soooo...Barry Bonds doesn't have the right to consider the aging process a physical problem worth treating? Yet Kirk Gibson has the right to consider the pain in his beaten up knees a physical problem worth treating? They both only want to extend their career, after all.

(Leaving aside the legal issue of course. And the bad side effects of steroid use.)
Well, if you wanna leave the legal and moral issues aside, I guess you can say that Bonds has got the right to get a Uzi and take care of all the sportswriters that are bothering him too.

Does that fit in with your argument?
Uzi?

Why an uzi?

What's wrong with a good old made in the USA M16? He can even get a grenade launcher for the days when he's feeling too shaky to shoot straight. Can't do that with a damn Uzi.

Why buy an import? Why do you hate America?

btw...watching the 'Nova/Rutgers game on espn2? Not a bad game.
Reply With Quote