Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
JR
If we can agree that both cases represent the start of a dribble, then I will but point out that there is a difference in the OOB rule compared to the B/C rule. For this not to be a violation in the OOB case, it must not only be a dribble but an interrupted dribble - otherwise the oft cited 9-3-1 comes into play. In the B/C case, that is not a relevant consideration, unless I have missed something.
|
Coach,you're exactly right.That's why I pointed out before that 2 different violations were invoved.I probably could have worded it better,but what you are saying is what I was trying to show.The OOB play just adds another element(9-3-1).You're also right when you say that judgement comes into play on the OOB play as to whether it is an interrupted dribble,or not.It could possibly be called either way, if the ref happens to rule that the player could dribble immediately.Personally,I agree 100% with Tony.It's almost impossible for a player to save a ball going OOB,and then be in a position to dribble immediately.If you read it the other way,you almost have to "mind-read" the player to say he is trying to pass to himself.My judgement isn't that good.If there is any doubt at all in my mind about a call,I usually try to pass on it. it.Saves me second-guessing myself later.