|
Hey everyone. I am new to the board. Officiated for several years but am currently on leave while i attend dental school. Anyway, i am playing in a league (with untrained officials and director) and the following rule came under dispute when a player when up for a 'shot', was fouled in mid-air, and then never released the ball but instead fell to the floor waiting for the wistle. The player jumped from behind the 3-point line so when the official ruled 3 free throws i naturally disputed the call saying that by definition a shot must involve the release of the ball. Below is the rule i received from the director who continues to argue the otherway around. I also have the following quote from him ... "I can't belive you don't get call a shooting foul if the shooter is unable to get the shot of. If that were true it would be smart to foul guys so hard they can't get the shot off.. that seems stupid."
What's your interpretation?
NHSAA - Rule 4 under one of the definitions of act of shooting, try, etc.
4-41 defines when a try starts and when it ends. As part of the rule,
the "act of shooting" is defined. Article 3 says it best: "The try
starts when the player begins the motion which habitually precedes the
release of the ball."
|