View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 02, 2001, 02:41pm
Carl Childress Carl Childress is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by Bfair
As I see it, the difference in what is being discussed here deals with first determinng if the obstruction is Type A or Type B. That, in itself, determines whether you are allowed to consider the results of a throw made after the time of obstruction.

In Type A obstruction, the infraction occurs after or at the same time as a throw is being made on the runner. Therefore, the throw "is committed to" by the defense at the time of obstruction. It is part of the playing action. Other than that throw, nothing thereafter is considered part of playing action---including a "late", errant throw subsequently attempted. Since with Type A we are to kill the ball immediately, we are also now allowed to accept any result of the throw that would benefit the offense. Meaning, since the throw was made before or during the time of the obstruction, the umpire may include the result of the throw in his determination of the award. If the ball is in the air at time of obstruction and later is determined to be errant (goes to DBT or in play away from any fielders), the umpire may include that fact in his determination of the award---awarding MORE than the required one base per rule.

OTH, if a play is in progress on a Type A obstructed runner(perhaps a runner in a rundown), but the release of the throw is after the obstruction has occurred, then the result of the throw is irrelevant and not considered in any award, and the award is only the required one base.

Type B obstruction allows for the concept of a ball being thrown after the obstruction whereby that throw IS considered. Suppose BR is obstructed after he rounded 1B and while progressing to 2nd. You may only be protecting him to 2B. The ball is close to, but has not yet reached F8 who is fielding it in the left center field gap. BR is close to 2B when F8 makes his throw toward 3B to stop BR's further advancement. The throw is misplayed and enters the dugout.

Rather than awarding the BR 2 bases from his location at TOT, the umpire may consider the fact that BR would have been to 2nd base at TOT had it not been for the obstruction. Therefore, he may award 2 bases to BR (the award for throw going into DBT) based on where BR would have been had it not been for the obstruction---thereby sending BR to home on a ball entering DBT.

I note, however, that I could only see this happening on a Type B obstruction since it would be the only time a throw would be considered if made after the time of obstruction.Freix
Steve:


Yes.

__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote