|
I, too, have enjoyed the civil conversation. I try not to call palming violations on an unguarded player, but sometimes the palming is SO obvious, so blatant, that it kind of *has* to be called, no? Every once in a while you'll see a player have a brain blurp and commit an illegal dribble (of the "double dribble" variety) that comes completely out of no where. I always call that violation (if I see it, of course); why is the palming variety treated differently? Why should it be?
Thanks for the continuing valuable observations.
|