View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 29, 2001, 10:16am
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
A catch is a catch is a catch. That's how I think it should be. There's no reason to change the rule. If we're going to change the definition of a catch then we also have to change the fair catch rule and allow a fair catch after the ball has hit the ground. It's a simple requirement. Catch the ball in flight and you benefit from the rule. Catch it on the hop and you don't.

On your screaming line drive kick, the rules are already in place. All he has to do is allow the ball to go into the EZ and he gets a TB. Or he can let it go OOB and get the ball at the 35. If it's a punt, then you're depriving the kicking team of making an outstanding play by kicking such a difficult kick to handle.

"I can't give him a safety and so far, our state has backed up this call."

Has a coach challenged your call in such a case. Becasue if he has, I have to say that he's right and what you're doing is wrong. It's a safety. You're setting aside a rule because you don't like it. And if SC is backing you up, well, I'm glad I live north of the state line. How many other rules does the state allow you guys to ignore?

You asked for opinions, that's mine.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote