Mon Jan 02, 2006, 02:01pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
|
|
|
Re: Re: BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
I just don't believe that the NFHS ever intended what we call the three points rule to apply during an interrupted dribble. I think that it was meant to apply to situations in which there is player control, and player control doesn't exist during an interrupted dribble. Right now, I'm on the side of calling backcourt violations in parts 1 and 3, but I'm far from sure that I'm right.
|
As you many times do NV, you're posting what you think without any backing from the Fed. There's no indication that the Fed wants us to rule any differently when there's an interrupted dribble.
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
"And those rules say that an interrupted dribble doesn't mean the dribble has ended"
Say it?
Or is it that the 'rules' don't say that an interrupted dribble means the dribble has ended?
Not the same thing in a rules based system of moderate complexity.
|
Six of one, half dozen of the other, Jeff.
|
In logic, not in law.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
|