|
With engaged I was trying to articulate B6 runs onto the floor, goes directly to A3 and screams at him-I have no idea why. A3 obstensibly does nothing and thus was not assesed any type of foul.
I know none of you saw the play but I found it very difficult to DQ A2 and B2 for the kick (and miss) and the throwing of the ball. I believe we should have called them two seperate unsportsmanlike acts resulting in T's and each team should have shot two FT's. Do we have any flexability or do they have to be called fighting and DQ's?
Since there is no fight between A3 and B6 I think we all agree I kicked it by giving B6 a T-I should have simply ejected him. Does the B coach get an indirect?
This still leaves the question of B6 coming on the floor the 2nd time. When is a player no longer a player? Since I had not as yet reported the ejection to the table is he still a player? If he's not a player then can any actions commited by this "individual" (fighting, flagrant T, team fouls etc.) result in a penalty to the team and/or coach? At the time I rationalized the "coach is responsible for his program" theory and thus gave him the 2nd indirect for B6's stupidity. If there is no penalty for a player who has been removed from the contest what would prevent the "individual" from doing anything he/she wants?
|