Chuck and joseph: I don't see support for your interpretations in the rules, so please advise. The CB play ruling doesn't specify a distinction between Type 1/2 and Type 3 violations. Without more, I can't assume that the intent of play interp was to differentiate between violation types.
I believe the intent of the three types of violations is to separate out two things: immediate dead ball vs. delayed dead ball, and violations that end up with points scored. Type I = immediate dead ball; Type II = immediate dead ball; scoring possible; Type III = delayed dead ball possible (not to mention ignoring violation possible). I don't think this has anything to do with the play at hand.
|