View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 29, 2005, 02:20pm
ChrisSportsFan ChrisSportsFan is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by IREFU2
I agree, another free throw should have been given due to the lane violation.
That's wrong.

If there are two (non-simultaneous) LANE violations (i.e., 9-1-6, 9-1-7), then only penalize the first.

If there's a LANE violation followed by a different FT violation (person behind the three-point line enters early, thrower over the line, thrower misses the rim), then penalize them both (unless you think the second was due to disconcertion).
What you're saying is correct in another stitch but not in this one. He said B41 entered the lane early then the freethrower air-balled it. The official has already held up his signal for the kid coming in early so why would you not give the shooter another try after the disconcertion?
__________________
Do you ever feel like your stuff strutted off without you?
Reply With Quote