View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 31, 2001, 12:55pm
Kelvin green Kelvin green is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,281
First in response to BktBallRef... there is no place in the original question/ruling about the airborne shooter. The airborne shooter creates an issue that you wonder if the NCAA did not overlook. It would not be the first time the ruling body messed up on an interpretation.

Second I agree with Mark that penalties dont carry over, but the ruling stated... (b) When the foul occurs after the second half has clearly ended, the extra period shall begin with the free throws. So we have a foul after the period has ended, I think the ruling may be kinda correct. If a foul occurs after the period has ended, I can see why they would say administer it in OT but Shouldn't this contact be ignored... if it's not ignored it's a dead ball foul, and would be a T. I'm sorry but there are too many problems with this ruling looking at it on the face
Reply With Quote