I have to take issue with what seems to have become a popular theme in this thread. If two teams are "evenly matched" and the foul count is "out of balance", then my conclusion is that the two teams aren't really "evenly matched". Obviously, one is beating the other to the ball, and/or quicker on their first step to the hoop, and/or better at gaining rebounding position, etc. That's a major reason that the other team is fouling. I admit it might not be the only reason, but it is a major one.
Now, having said that, I know there are some times that when the count is out of balance it is partly because of a difference in the calls between partners, and one partner just happens to be lead a lot when one team is on offense. I have seen this happen, although it is not too common. What I do not believe, however, is that I am so bad that I only see fouls on one team and not the other to the point that if the fouls at halftime are 10-2, it is my fault.
And another thing - if "game management" means I intentionally call minor contact on one team just to "even up the fouls" so a coach won't have another reason to blow up, then the theory of "game management" sucks. I can't be responsible for every conceivable psychological problem a coach may have or change my game because players may get frustrated and then play rougher because they perceive the refs are against them.
I can only do so much out there, and my main job is to call the game consistently and equally. I'm not going to artificially manipulate the game just to avoid potential problems. I use tact and "game presence" to be in control, not change the way I make my calls.
If my main objective was to call the game in a manner that would head off any conceivable trouble at the expense of calling the game fairly and equally, I would officiate sewing bees.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
|