Thu Oct 18, 2001, 05:51pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rockyroad
Double foul doesn't fit the original situation either, because it has to be two players fouling each other...the original situation had A2 fouling B2 and at the same time B3 fouling A3...that surely aresn't no double foul...and again, there is no provision for simultaneous personal fouls...that wasn't too hard of a riddle...
DJ
|
"aresn't"?
Chuck
|