Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
From the NFHS website:
LEAVING COURT FOR UNAUTHORIZED REASON CHANGED TO VIOLATION (9-3-2): The rule for leaving the court for an unauthorized reason has been changed from a technical foul to a violation. Leaving the court during the course of play has been increasing with the former penalty of a technical foul not being assessed. Typically, this play is seen when an offensive player goes around a low screen, runs outside the end line and returns on the other side of the court free of their defender. The violation will be called as soon as the player leaves the court. The committee hopes that changing the penalty will increase the likelihood of the infraction being called and eliminate this tremendous advantage.
According to the NF, leaving the court to get around a screen to free up from a defender is an unauthorized reason to leave the court. It doesn't say anything about "except during a throw-in after a basket". Now, if the player, while he's OOB, turns and looks at their teammate as if they might be expecting a pass, then that is certainly allowed under the throw-in provisions. So it seems as though we need to judge intent somehow. If the intent is to be a part of the throw-in, then no violation. If the intent is to solely evade a defender around the screen, then it seems to be a violation.
|
Coupla things, 2M Guy:
1. You are incorrect when you say that "According to the NF". The NF did nothing more than give an example of the play that they consider "typical". If I say I "typically" have a glass of wine, or 2, with dinner does that mean I arrive under the influence if I eat diner before a game?
2. Then you go on to give an example of how we could properly judge A3's intent under your interp - by waiting to see what A3 does after he goes OOB. Yet the rule says we have to call the violation as soon as the player leaves the court.
Which is it?