Thread: award bases
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 08, 2005, 06:50am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Re: awarded bases

Quote:
Originally posted by RadDad2005
I've been away from the game for a few years, the answer to this question seems obvious, but I have a question.
Bases loaded, bottom of 7th (last inning), score tied. Batter walks to score winning run, but batter in celebration does not touch first and leaves the playing field. The defense throws the ball to first, ump calls him out, run doesn't count and off to extra innings we go. Seems correct, but is the fact that the base is awarded change anything about the batters responsibility to touch first? The runner on third was also awarded home with what was supposed to be the winning run (not relevant I suppose, but...).
I seem to remember something about awarded bases that might differ, but it's been so many years, I just can't say. I did not see this incident, the story was related to me. I think the ump did the right thing, but did he? Thanks.
Speaking ASA and assuming two outs prior to the pitch.

The awarded base is to the batter only, not any active runners. Only runners forced to advance as a result of the walk are protected. However, when the out is made, the forced no longer exists, so those runners may still advance, but no run is permitted to score as the third out of the inning was the result of the BR not attaining 1B safely prior to being retired.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote