|
REPLY: Mike is correct that this is a PSK-enforcement foul. I can also see the confusion that case play 10.2.1D might create. The clause "...since it did not foul prior to the kick crossing the expanded neutral zone" is extraneous to the play. It well may be a vestige of the 2003 case book. When PSK was first introduced to the Federation game, there was a requirement the the foul must occur after the kick crossed the ENZ. That was inconsistent with the NCAA and NFL PSK rules and was virtually impossible to officiate. So they changed it last season.
__________________
Bob M.
|