|
That is what I thought. Was hopeing someone could point me to a casebook play or an interpretation to support that ruling. In the game that this happened, it was not ruled PSK because K was in posession when the down ended - but is this not just a technicality since, if no foul had occured, the ball will be awarded to R just like if the ball had rolled OOB or stopped in the field of play with no player of R or K attempting to posess the ball.
2-16g5 states "And K does not have posession of the ball when the down ends and will not be the next to put the ball in play". If you say that K's recovery of the ball caused the down to end, that supports the argument that this would not be PSK enforcement.
|