Wed Aug 10, 2005, 12:05pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
|
|
|
You dah man
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Just my warped, legalistic opinion. 
|
I'm tending to agree with your interpretation here, Nevada (although I'd lean heavily toward calling disconcertion in these type situations), however, I want to pose a hypothetical question.
A1 is shooting FT's, and B1 is along the lane line. B1 is also (for some odd reason) a world champion gymnast. B1 plants his hands in the lane, moves his body forward, and does a horizontal handstand (supporting his body horizontally) with his feet above the marked lane space (not penetrating the plane).
If there were no prohibition for disconcertion, would you call this a violation?
|
Too funny!
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
|