|
How about instead it's a poorly worded question where the intent by the author was to make it true?
That, in my humble opinion, is constantly a problem with the NFHS tests. There are a number of questions where you have to read "intent" into what they are getting at rather than just evaluating the question. For example, the already much discussed #2.
But I also don't worry about it too much, because even with missing the f'd up questions, it's possible to pass the test. You guys don't have to score 100%, do you? It's better to known how the ruling goes on the field than in the fairy land of the NFHS test and it seems most here have that down.
|