View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 27, 2005, 11:31am
M&M Guy M&M Guy is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
I would treat this as if there had been a TO before the first FT. In other words, after giving the ball back to the shooter, the delayed violation would still be place. I can't find the case play right now, but I know it's in there somewhere.
I remember that was a NCAA-W interpretation that came out last year, but I don't remember seing it in NF books. It makes sense that the violation doesn't go away because there's a stoppage in play (other than a second violation, foul, etc.). Perhaps closely_guarded's partner thought they were just trying to be nice by re-setting the play after seeing the player step in. But, short of the problem being caused by the referee, I would still have the (delayed) violation.

As far as coaches and fans not knowing the rules, that's the first time I've heard that. In the last hour, at least.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote