View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 14, 2005, 08:55pm
Jurassic Referee Jurassic Referee is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
If you're unsure which occurred first, it would be better to err on the side of the violation, rather than give a player a foul that he shouldn't have received.
Why? If a player actually committed a foul, why shouldn't they be called for doing so? Why should we always penalize the team that committed the violation- no matter what? If I'm unsure about anything, I ain't gonna be blowing my whistle anyway(hopefully).

You guys are way too deep for me. I ain't good enough to call it that way every time. I just try to make what I think the right and proper call should be in each particular situation, without predetermining what it oughta be. I try to only blow my whistle when I know what I'm gonna call. I'm too dumb to do it any other way.
Reply With Quote