Quote:
Originally posted by TigerBball
OK, in the case of the jumpstop and a player steps with one foot and simultaneously lands on two, the rule says neither is a pivot. So I am assuming that you can not then step and lift a foot to shoot or pass as described because you can not lift a pivot foot that you never had. Am I understanding this correctly.
|
Thanks, TigerBball.
I get your point. but I am not sure if I am fully convinced by this analogy.
In your example, the rule 43-4-a describes it as allowed move. Further more, this move does not contradict any other rules.
In my example, first, there are no explicit rule describes this "jump" as allowed move. second, if it is implied that this "jump" is allowed, then the logic of this rule set seems very twisted.
But if 43-2-a(2) only describe a "step", the logic of related rules are more consistent.
Thanks.