Fri May 13, 2005, 03:17pm
|
|
In Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ysong
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
C)gets the ball when both feet off the floor, then foot #1 back to floor, foot #1 off the floor, foot #2 back to floor, foot #2 off the floor, ball gone, foot(feet) back to floor. This is the land-jump-jump-shoot sequence, with alternate "footings".
D)gets the ball when both feet off the floor, then foot #1 back to floor, foot #1 off the floor, foot #1 back to floor again(!), foot #1 off the floor, ball gone, foot (feet) back to the floor. this is the land-jump-jump-shoot sequence, with the same footing.
Um, nope.
One red + one green does not equal two red + one green. 
mick
|
That is why I said "in essence" they were the same. 
in stead of landing simultaneously on both feet, the player lands on one foot only, then jumps right off to shoot. In this regard, C and D are the same.
Actually, C is not listed in the "prescribed limit" in NCAA either, right? But no one really questions C's legitimacy.
So what makes C a legal move in NCAA? Why can't it apply to D also?
Thanks.
|
Have a nice day.
mick
|