|
outathm, I just can't let that go. Mike said it best, but I simply can't refrain from comment after such a blatant disregard for the rules coming from an umpire. ASA has stated repeatedly that subsequent action should not alter your decision as to where the obstructed runner should end up.
Has anybody heard of it? Of course, and it's wrong. Wrong by rule, wrong by practice.
Debeau - I still want to see the rule you guys are using to justify the "NZ interpretation" on this. Seriously, you are giving defenses everywhere all the incentive in the world to obstruct on purpose.
|