I am sure all of the big dogs have left this thread and said they are not to return. But if you do then maybe you could explain comments like:
"Your reputation will be one of an umpire who (1)squeezes pitchers and (2) doesn't know how to call a good corner".
I know how to call a corner, not a pitch 2-3" off of the black, that is not a corner.
"But, if you like calling balls and consistently have 3 hr games. Be our guest. Now when you get to the Pros, well good job and we hope you come back to give us your input then, too".
So does this mean that we should not immenuate what the pros do?
"I also am considered a "pitcher's umpire." Do I "expand" the strike zone . . . nope, I just call more of it than some".
Expand --No, More of it--Yes? You mean you call the strike zone defined in the rulebook PLUS additional areas?
I come to this website mainly for guidance from much more seasoned officials than I. Do I take my share of "slaps"? Sure, it comes with the territory. I have learned alot from this forum. But messing with the strike zone seems wrong.
I have admired the way you guys are sticklers for the rulebook. "If it is a balk, then call it!" "If it is in the rulebook, then you must enforce it". But now when it comes to the strike zone it is okay to change the guidelines. Wow, I'm disillusioned by this inconsistency. I think maybe there is a good reason for it. But all I get is a time thing, or batters can adjust, or boring 14-13 with 26 walks.
Please convince me of the err of my ways, because at this moment I am very disappointed in most of the responses.
I have always not liked the adage "We get paid to call strikes and outs". We get paid to do our job!!
|