Thread: Interference?
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2005, 07:10am
rwest rwest is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Suwanee Georgia
Posts: 1,050
By rule, it has to be intentional

Quote:
Originally posted by AtlUmpSteve
I would consider that interference. R1 has no business standing at the plate under any circumstances, and I could not consider that coincidental.
What would you rule on this....


R1 on 3B, B2 squeeze bunts and the ball is spinning backwards toward home plate. As R1 slides safely across the plate their hand contacts the ball in fair territory.

Ruling?
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association
Multicounty Softball Association
Multicounty Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote