|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Patrick Szalapski
[B]Buster, your ruling is correct for batting out-of-order, which is separate from a plain old illegal substitute.
__________________________________________________ ________
If we assume either batting out of order or an illegal substitution than wouldn't the guy in the 2nd slot be up, not the 8th slot, as buster suggested. As I read the thread, the person who should have been up was batter number 1 thus making batter number 2 the guy who bats next. I disagree that Batter number 9 is up.
Greg
[Edited by Gre144 on Jul 12th, 2001 at 05:38 PM]
|