Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
I can only think that this runner would have scored if no one would have OBS'd (and I likely would have made that judgement before seeing the throw come in from RF).
|
Question: are you saying your first judgment (that this was a triple) was wrong, or are you saying that the defense was slow enough in retrieving the ball that it NOW looks like it would have been a home run?
Even without the second OBS, it would appear that as the runner passed 2nd, you were revising your judgment on where she would have ultimately ended up.
Personally, I would have revised the judgment at the time of the 2nd OBS and awarded her home. I have no idea if that notion is supported by clinicians and/or NUS.
But this play illustrates my discomfort with the "judge now and don't revise" teaching about OBS.