View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 01, 2001, 08:07am
Carl Childress Carl Childress is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edinburg, TX
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via ICQ to Carl Childress
Quote:
Originally posted by JJ
I second that motion. If it was a situation where I felt the runner, seeing the ball go by the first baseman and toward the fence, could have made it to second had there been no "obstruction", that's what I award him. If I don't, what's to stop any fielder from "obstructing" a runner not trying to advance in order to GUARANTEE that he won't advance in the event of a badly thrown ball?
JJ: I reckon the answer to your question is 2.00 Obstruction:

    Obstruction is the act of a fielder who, while not in possession of the ball and not in the act of fielding the ball, impedes the progress of a runner.

Now, if "advancing" in your play means making "prgress" in the mind (Hell, I think I might try for second), then you got me, for sure.

__________________
Papa C
My website
Reply With Quote