View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 19, 2005, 04:43pm
Dave Hensley Dave Hensley is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
What you missed was this statement from the original post:

"R1 DOES NOT retouch 2B on his way back to 1B after the catch."

That makes R1 subject to appeal at 2B, but the wild throw allowed R1 to advance to 2B, and due to the "last time by" principle, R1 is no longer appealable for missing 2B on his earlier return.
Reply With Quote