Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB
jicecone writes: 1.Hits the runner, we have interference. Wether it was intentional or not , it was interference.
I'm not a FED expert by any means, but how does this jive with FED 8-4-2(g)
Any runner is out when he:
intentionally interferes with a throw or a thrown ball...
|
Garth, I agree with what your saying but I based this upon two rulings:
1.BRD2005 Sit 320 pg 204 bottom
"Except: OFF INTERP 224-320: Rumble: On a force play a runner hit by a thrown ball between bases is guilty of interference if he did not slide or [presumably] run well away from the fielder making the throw. (News #1,3/98)"
As further stated 30 feet from first may be a different scenario.
This is also as stated in Childress's book, 2004 "The Usual Suspects", Chapt I pg 12. Play Ruling 11. "Result: Double Play"
Carl states in BRD2005 pg 205,
"Note 342-320: The Rumble ruling is consistent and illuminating, therefore helpful. But it is not definitive, for it leaves an important question unanswered: How close does the runner have to be to the "forced" base before the umpire rules interference?"
He does state further on though, "Let the umpire judgement carry the day"