View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2001, 05:53pm
joemoore joemoore is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 71
I'm having a hard time visualizing this play.

F4 must be playing in, and he dives back into the base line, which means the ball is hit sharply. In his dive, he bumps R1. R1 stumbles backwards and is hit by the ball.

I have a hard time imagining that the runner was hit by the ball after contacting the fielder and the fielder didn't have a legitimate play on the ball. So my leaning is to say interference on the runner.

If the contact was minimal, then the runner would be running behind the fielder and the fielder would then have dove past the ball. In that case, the ball having passed an infielder, live ball play on.

I think if there was any substantial contact with the fielder in the act of playing the ball, even though unintentional, you need to call interference on the runner.

Reply With Quote