OK,
Let me get this straight:
If Evans says one thing, and Roder says another who trumps whom?
Not a very tough call:
Roder once published that a pitch that bounces BEFORE a batter swings and tips it, that the ball COULD NOT BE CAUGHT for a foul tip.
Pretty strange. If the same pitch could be hit for a home run why not a foul tip.
Evans set him straight.
While neither Evans not Roder are official in their interpretations I think it is pretty obvious that Evans's work carries much more weight.
Let's thank a FED missprint for this entire thread.
|