|
>>BktBallRef takes the time to cite the complete case play for you and explain the concept, and all you can say is "Naw, that ain't right". Well, I got a novel little concept for ya. You cite a NFHS rule that negates that case book play and backs up your little flight of fantasy.<<
If you would actually read what I wrote, and try to understand it, you would find that I already did just that.
Do I need to show you my posts, or are you actually capable of reading the entire post?
I didn't say, "naw, that ain't right." Don't make things up. What I said was that 1) I strongly disagree with the interpretation -- i.e., I don't think the casebook authors are correct. If its approved, its approved and if I were working HS games and my state association said to use all ARs, I'd use it; and 2) (the real issue) that the interp doesn't apply to the original post and the original question.
|