View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 27, 2004, 08:41pm
Rich's Avatar
Rich Rich is offline
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,793
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Nope, you're just still learning how to take the tests. You can't read more into the question than is stated. Two FTs and the ball at the division line is a true statement. Opposite the table just makes it "more" true.
Obviously that's what they are looking for. I would argue that that question is poorly worded. If it is indeed a true statement than one could conclude that the ball could be inbounded either tableside or opposite the table.
Gordon,

There were pooly worded questions -- this wasn't one of them. It's a true statement as written.

--Rich
Reply With Quote