Thread: what to do
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2004, 12:06pm
Robmoz Robmoz is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 480
A warning would not be necessary in this situation as it was clearly an unsporting act for A1 to hold the ball intentionally thus preventing B1 from inbounding the ball. Some might try to issue a warning and put three seconds back on the clock which would give Team A an advantage in setting up their defense for the inbound pass.

I believe that a technical foul should be called (9.2.11) on A1 for a delay of game there is no warning for this per the case book referenced.
__________________
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
Chris Z.
Detroit/SE Michigan
Reply With Quote