|
I think I did the right thing by keeping it to myself unless asked.
Here another question. A is awarded a 1&1. The first shot is missed but a lane violation is called. The replacement shot is made. A1 is entitled to another shot because she made the first shot of a 1&1. The table did not do anything. Was that an instance when the table should have got involved? I am not surprised they didn't because even if they had noticed the team that got shorted was the visitors.
|