Will you please learn to read...
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
1) The IHSA changed the language of the recent handbook. For many years it recommended that officials should take the Part II test as often as possible. In past books, this was included in the “How to become a better Official” section. It has also been part of the IACAO curriculum for man years.
It was removed from the book, but remained in the packet we received last January.[/B]
|
Well it does not know and has not since they changed the Part 2 Exam administration.
***Yes, that is what "recent handbook" means. It was changed last year. I have the 2002 and 2003 books, you are wrong - it is in there.***
Quote:
Originally posted by WindyCityBlue
2) The IHSA now runs the Part II test and requires registration. It is provided at sites (available on-line) and is managed on a space available basis. In other words, if they have twenty five officials requesting promotion, they will be frugal in allowing others to take the test for practice. It costs them money to offer the test, after all.
|
The test is not available on-line. Only the Part 1 Exam is available online. They might tell you what you received on the test, but you cannot take this test online.
***Reading 101 - the sites are available on line. I've already explained how it is scored.***
Quote:
Originally posted by WindyCityBlue
3) The Part I and II tests are important gauges of baseball knowledge. After a few months in hibernation, the umpire can count on having to crack open the rule and case books in order to complete the test. The Part II proves that you can perform under pressure and do it better than the rest. If you look at the number of Certified umpires in Illinois (compared to the total number of licensed umpires) you will see how special this achievement really is.
|
That is your opinion. That is not the shared opinion of many umpires or officials in many sports. Because what I read is not about what I see and how I have to react. If you feel it is, you have that right to fell that way. I disagree. What else is new?
***Nothing...you have been devoid of logic and fact since coming to this site. Many others have told you the same. These tests have been used for more years than you have been alive. If they had no merit, they would have gone away long ago. Speaking of going away...could you?***
Quote:
Originally posted by WindyCityBlue
I like the old system that allowed groups to administer the Part II test. More people took it and the old tests circulated for others to study the next year. Since it was given on only one day, we had very little risk of the answers leaking out. It six years ago, but the test is still given statewide (by the IHSA) on the same day. If you cannot make it to one of their sites, you have to be given special permission to take it at their headquarters.
|
You want to talk about cheating? Cheating was one of the reasons they changed the process of this test all together. Associations would administer the test and literally the administrators would give the answers to the actual answer key and let people pass the test. Not just the answers, the answer key.
***Wow, that is called libel. Do you have proof of these claims or are you lying again? Which groups and individuals provided these answer keys? If you want to disparage an entire state, call an attorney first. The reason it was changed may have done more with accountability than anything. Several years ago an entire packet of Part 2 tests went missing. This was a football exam and those guys were pissed. The IHSA took control of the situation and it just makes it tougher for guys like you to become Certified.***
Quote:
Originally posted by WindyCityBlue
We've covered this before. It appears that only a couple of states don't use the tests in some capacity. The majority use them for annual or post season eligibility, promotion or rating criteria.
|
I realize they might use one or the other. But you have been on a crusade to call everyone a cheater and you do not know which states use the Part 1 Exam at all. I know of states that make up their own test as well. If someone uses the test to personally check their answers to this test, which is given out for study purposes only, you have no right to call them cheaters without know the process in which they use the test. I guess you have the right to say anything you like, but you would be wrong. But that has never stopped you before.
***Wake up...when someone posts, "Hey, send me the answers, too." They aren't looking for anything more than to be able to cheat. I was very tempted to just make up 100 "ABCD" answers and email them along. That would serve them right.
Peace [/B][/QUOTE]
***Much like Falujjah, that offer/extol rings hollow.***